A man lost his wife and mother-in-law and saw his daughter
seriously injured and permanently disabled due to a head-on crash on an
Arkansas highway. Crashworthiness issues surrounding
Daimler-Chrysler’s design of the long-popular Chrysler minivan
were the main focus of a trial in Memphis, Tennessee which
resulted in a $53 million dollar verdict against the
automaker.
The vehicle which crashed head-on into the
family’s van was also a Chrysler – a Jeep Cherokee. Although
made by the same company, after the accident the Jeep showed far less damage to
the occupant compartment of the vehicle. When Chrysler
designed the minivan, made several years ago, it made a
decision to design the crush zones so that the vehicle would
buckle directly under the driver seat and front passenger
seat.
In the Arkansas crash, the driver of the minivan saw the Jeep
swerving out of the oncoming lane and quickly pulled off the
side of the road and attempted to stop. The Jeep, however,
veered too far over and struck the minivan head-on as it had almost
come to a stop. The crush zones under the front seats gave
way, crushing the driver and her mother and causing injuries
to the young girl in the second row seat.
A wrongful death suit was filed on behalf of the deceased
wife and the estate of his mother-in-law and a personal
injury claim was made by and for his minor daughter who was
permanently injured in the crash. At the time, I was
clerking for the firm of Morris, Haynes & Hornsby and spent
considerable time in Memphis working on the case. I was also
able to join the vehicle expert in his inspection of the
crash vehicle which ultimately resulted in testimony
constituting the plaintiff's strongest evidence of
wrongdoing by Daimler-Chrysler.
All settlement offers were rejected and the case went to
trial. A Memphis jury deliberated for a short time and
returned a $53 million dollar verdict in favor of the
plaintiffs. Cases like this show how important of a role the
law plays in the evolution and design of automobile safety
technology. And regardless of what tort reform advocates
would have you believe, automobile crashworthiness lawsuits like this
one bring about real changes that
truly save lives in the future.
"No communication concerning a lawyer's services shall be
published or broadcast, unless it contains the following language,
which shall be clearly legible or audible, as the case may be: 'No representation
is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is
greater than the quality of legal services performed by other
lawyers.' "
Rule of Professional Responsibility 7.2(e)